William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KLYCZEK Andrew | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 2 | BRATTON Jack S. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 3 | PETERS Nathan M. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | EMENHEISER Conrad | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 5 | SEMP Iain | - | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
| 6 | POLONI Giovanni | - | 4% | 29% | 47% | 18% | 2% | |
| 7 | YAP Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 8 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 9 | LAPALLO Adam C. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 10 | GIBSON Russell L. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 37% | 4% |
| 11 | PEZZAT Daniel S. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
| 12 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 13 | CRANE William | 2% | 19% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 14 | ISAACSON Bjorn | - | 2% | 41% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | REEDER Nicholas W. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 16 | FADL Omar | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
| 17 | O'DONNELL Breck | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% | |
| 18 | HINDS David E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 19 | THAN Duc | 8% | 40% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | EDRALIN II Chadwick Q. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | MITCHELL Christopher | 1% | 20% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 22 | CONANT Aidan | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | PRICE Owen | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | HAYES Nathan P. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | ZIMSKY James | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | EDRALIN Alexander Jordan Q. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 19% | |
| 27 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | RUSANOV Oleg | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | TETTERTON Jr Joseph S. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | SAE-TUNG Kevin | 27% | 52% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | MAHNKEN Thomas P. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | JACKSON Evan | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 34 | GIBSON Karino | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | DEVINNEY Dale | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | KASPER Lucia | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | DELANNES-MOLKA Daniel | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | LIU Angela | 12% | 72% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | FIGLOZZI Cordelia | 60% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | YE Jessica | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | POOLE Katherine | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.