William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MONTESI Eric | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 2 | WATSON Raymond | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
| 3 | YI Nathan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 1% |
| 3 | BUI Ryan | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 5 | WALLACE George | - | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 6 | SHOWALTER Zachary | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 7 | BARTLETT Lauren | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
| 8 | YAP Nathan | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 9 | BLUM Oliver | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 10 | HERMES Henry | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 40% | 10% |
| 11 | KEIM Spencer | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 12 | ANDERSON Dean | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 13 | HINDS David E. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 14 | FEAGIN Patrick | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 1% |
| 15 | KELLOFF Michael | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | JAROSZ Joshua | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 17 | BADLANI Neel | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | LANDERS Sarah | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 20 | MARKOWITZ Sam | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | PANE Patrick | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 22 | BLANKENSHIP Benjamin T. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 23 | CARCATERRA Theodore | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | WANDMACHER GUERRERO Angela | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | WALLS Annie | 1% | 37% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | ROUADY Ryan | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 27 | KRONAUGE Andersen | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | WEIDMAN Jess | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | TANG Justin | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 31 | LUNDEN Espen | 3% | 23% | 50% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | MOORE Mary | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | BARBER Christopher | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | IVATURI Sivakrishna | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 34 | SCHICKEL Juliana | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 36 | FISH Bradley | - | < 1% | 3% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 6% |
| 37 | LAWLESS Elizabeth | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MCGUIRE Meghan | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | DIX Philip-Alexander | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | HAINES Katherine | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | RICHARDSON Katie R. | 2% | 19% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.