William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FENG Leo | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | SOUDERS Peter F. | - | - | - | - | - | 13% | 87% |
| 3 | DECK Tyson | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 3 | SU Landon | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 57% | 26% |
| 5 | BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 54% | 10% | |
| 6 | BEATY Chad A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% | |
| 7 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 8 | LIN Felix | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 4% | |
| 9 | FENKER William M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% | |
| 10 | FORT David | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 22% | |
| 11 | LYON Drew | - | - | 1% | 13% | 48% | 38% | - |
| 12 | XU Ivan | - | - | 5% | 31% | 43% | 19% | 1% |
| 13 | FRUTH Evan | 3% | 30% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | SUN Ziyao | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% | |
| 15 | BIALIK Noah | 4% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | MARKOWITZ Jonathan | 1% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 2% |
| 18 | KIRCHMAIER Charlie | 2% | 40% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | SEMP Brannon A. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 20 | PARCELL Colby | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 21 | BENSON Jacob | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 22 | JENSBY Jason | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 23 | DELALIO Peter | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 24 | ROBLES Julio C. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 25 | XU Emily T. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 35% | |
| 26 | JACKSON Evan | - | - | 6% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 2% |
| 27 | FEIRA Justin | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | FENG Brendan | 1% | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | SUTHERLAND Jr. Richard L. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | CASSIDY Connor J. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | |
| 31 | STAM August M. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 32 | BARROSO Isabela | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | DREHER Matthew | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 34 | BENE Andrew | 1% | 15% | 53% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | LAUDO Joseph | - | - | 3% | 22% | 44% | 29% | 3% |
| 36 | NI Hao | 3% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | HINDS David E. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 38 | COLBY Mercer | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 39 | SU Ji | 4% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | WALKER Terra | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 41 | CAYABAN Jessica | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | WALLACE Leo | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | ZHAO Emily W. | - | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 44 | PEREGOY George | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 45 | KENNEDY Aidan | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | PHAM Matthew | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | BARR Corinne | 35% | 60% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | WANG Erica | 2% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 50 | OTT William | 33% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | LEE Angela | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | FLEEGER Sophia | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | WILFRET Katerina | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | ROCHARDSON Payten | 5% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | LESTYAN Cat | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | BLANKENSHIP Benjamin T. | 26% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | JIN Adam | 12% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | URIBE David | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.