William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 2 | SOUDERS Peter F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 87% |
| 3 | DECK Tyson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
| 3 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 26% |
| 5 | BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 10% | |
| 6 | BEATY Chad A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | |
| 7 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 8 | LIN Felix | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 4% | |
| 9 | FENKER William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | |
| 10 | FORT David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 11 | LYON Drew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% | - |
| 12 | XU Ivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 21% | 1% |
| 13 | FRUTH Evan | 100% | 97% | 67% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | SUN Ziyao | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% | |
| 15 | BIALIK Noah | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | MARKOWITZ Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 2% |
| 18 | KIRCHMAIER Charlie | 100% | 98% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | SEMP Brannon A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | PARCELL Colby | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 21 | BENSON Jacob | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% | |
| 22 | JENSBY Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | |
| 23 | DELALIO Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 24 | ROBLES Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 25 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 35% | |
| 26 | JACKSON Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
| 27 | FEIRA Justin | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 28 | FENG Brendan | 100% | 99% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | SUTHERLAND Jr. Richard L. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | CASSIDY Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 6% | |
| 31 | STAM August M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 32 | BARROSO Isabela | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 33 | DREHER Matthew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 34 | BENE Andrew | 100% | 99% | 84% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | LAUDO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 31% | 3% |
| 36 | NI Hao | 100% | 97% | 72% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 37 | HINDS David E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 38 | COLBY Mercer | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 39 | SU Ji | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | WALKER Terra | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | CAYABAN Jessica | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | WALLACE Leo | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | ZHAO Emily W. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 44 | PEREGOY George | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 45 | KENNEDY Aidan | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | PHAM Matthew | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 47 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | BARR Corinne | 100% | 65% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | WANG Erica | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 50 | OTT William | 100% | 67% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | LEE Angela | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | FLEEGER Sophia | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | WILFRET Katerina | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | ROCHARDSON Payten | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | LESTYAN Cat | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | BLANKENSHIP Benjamin T. | 100% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | JIN Adam | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | URIBE David | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.