William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | POLONI Giovanni | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 2 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 3 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 21% | 2% |
| 3 | SMOLICH Marat | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 5 | HINDS David E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
| 6 | AZIZI Zahl | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% |
| 7 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 8 | HAYES Nathan P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 9 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 10 | BOLTON Max | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | HARPER Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 22% |
| 12 | THAN Duc | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | REEDER Nicholas W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 14 | ZIMSKY James | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 11% | |
| 15 | EDRALIN II Chadwick Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 14% |
| 16 | FERGUSON Sam C. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | ALTON Abigail | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 16% | 1% |
| 18 | MAHNKEN Thomas P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 31% | 4% |
| 19 | KASPER Lucia | 100% | 96% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 20 | TANG Justin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
| 21 | IVATURI Sivakrishna | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 22 | DELANNES-MOLKA Daniel | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | |
| 23 | LIN Janice | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 23 | DEVINNEY Dale | 100% | 95% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 25 | TERPENNING Sarah | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 26 | FEAGIN Patrick | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 27 | BAYLESS Varnum | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | CONANT Aidan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 30 | HOPSON Ethan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | SAE-TUNG Kevin | 100% | 69% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | STEFFENSEN Lily | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | SNELL Angelina | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SINGH Jawand | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 35 | SINGH Meet | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | CARLEY Aubrey | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 38 | SAY Preston | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | GIBSON Karino | 100% | 79% | 27% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | MOORE Annette | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 41 | ALLEN Lily | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.