Catholic Memorial High School - Waukesha, WI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V | V V V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 2 | MANDADI Saicharan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | ZUBECK Dominic | V | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 3 | WANG Tyler | V | V V | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 5 | KIRCHNER Samuel | V | V V D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 6 | NGUYEN Quang (Benny) | V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 7 | HEIM Bryce | D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 8 | SINGH Ajay | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
| 9 | WANG William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | NADELLA Nitin | D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 11 | ARTLEY Keiran Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | WAGENIUS Per Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | PASTER Eli | D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 14 | LI Parker Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | MCGOUGH Kevin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | VILLANO Philip Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | HOSTERT Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | LU Chenyu (Al) | D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 19 | BAHRS Daniel Henry | V | V D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 20 | EAHEART Brennan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | LONG Joe Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | THOMPSON Soren Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | CORCORAN Brady | D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 24 | TAN Chengyao | V | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 | |
| 25 | DECENA Nathan Riley | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
| 26 | PAPASDENNERLINE Jake Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | NGUYEN Tien (Tim) Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | FITZGERALD Aidan | D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 29 | KIM Eun Taek(Peter) Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | WANG David Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | SANFILIPPO Ben Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | WEATHERLY Hugh Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | PLANKENHORN Reese Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | QIU Jerry Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | LE Sam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | JONES Jaden | V | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 | |
| 37 | SUH Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | RAYMOND Rocco Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | FRANKLIN William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | BINGHAM Drew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | FELICIANO Damien Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | IVANOV Phillip Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | WAGNER Max Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | WILMOT Anray Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | ZIGNEGO Ben Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | FROHLING William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | PAULSEN Zachary | D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 48 | RAMIREZ Nathanial Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | ZONSIUS Spencer Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | FURLETT Yosef Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | SLUTZKY Jake Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | SHERBORNE John Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | FACKENTHAL Samuel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 54 | MASEK Matt Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | YOON Brian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | BALCHANDANI Rohan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 57 | WEMBER Matt Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | MILLER George Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | BOOKER Nicholas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | PRISTELSKI Evan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | MONTAGUE William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 62 | WALSDORF Joseph Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 63 | MENHEER Samuel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 64 | VANDEWALLE Henry Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 65 | THYREN Bennett Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 66 | DATTA Purav Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | KOCIECKI Kacper Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.