Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XU Luke | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | CERDA Giovanni | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | SCHNEIDER Allen J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | WANG Max | D D D V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 5 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | LOGGINS Austin J. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | SILVA Daniel | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 8 | RAKAJ Jozef | V D V D D | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 9 | JAYASANKAR Hari | V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 10 | LISSO Ria A. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | GONZALEZ Jerry | V D V V V | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 12 | MEIER Nicholas M. | D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 14 | SHANKWILER Christopher | V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 15 | EDWARDS Darby | D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 16 | TRUBEY Elise | D V D V D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | V V V D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 18 | NGUYEN Albert | V V D V V | D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 19 | BURGESS Beckham | D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 20 | JAYARAM Archita | D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | ODBADRAKH Batu | D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 22 | XIAO Yao | V D V D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 23 | RODRIGUEZ Jason | V D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 24 | HUGHES Eric | D V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | LEE Andrew | D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 26 | SHIH Christina | V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 27 | CALLAHAN Arrow | V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | DONDERIS katherine | V D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 29 | HARKONEN Eemil | V D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | BALAJI Tejas | D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 31 | STEWART Brian | D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | PIRRO Anton | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 33 | NGUYEN Andy | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 34 | YUAN Erin | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 35 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 36 | YANG Jenny J. | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 37 | LIM Kai | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 38 | SULLIVAN Axyl | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 39 | STOLL Fuller | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 40 | AVIDANO Mason | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 41 | CROSS Phoenix | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 42 | GURKIN Justin | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 43 | VIDRINE Odile | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.