Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XU Luke | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 47% | 18% |
2 | CERDA Giovanni | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% | |
3 | SCHNEIDER Allen J. | - | - | - | 2% | 28% | 69% | |
3 | WANG Max | 2% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
5 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 13% | |
6 | LOGGINS Austin J. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 27% | |
7 | SILVA Daniel | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 49% | |
8 | RAKAJ Jozef | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 23% | 3% | |
9 | JAYASANKAR Hari | - | 5% | 28% | 50% | 17% | 1% | |
10 | LISSO Ria A. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
11 | GONZALEZ Jerry | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
12 | MEIER Nicholas M. | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
13 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% | |
14 | SHANKWILER Christopher | - | - | 5% | 26% | 49% | 19% | |
15 | EDWARDS Darby | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
16 | TRUBEY Elise | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 62% | |
18 | NGUYEN Albert | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | < 1% | - | |
19 | BURGESS Beckham | - | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 1% | |
20 | JAYARAM Archita | 1% | 10% | 35% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | ODBADRAKH Batu | - | - | 3% | 24% | 55% | 17% | |
22 | XIAO Yao | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
23 | RODRIGUEZ Jason | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
24 | HUGHES Eric | 4% | 27% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | |
25 | LEE Andrew | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
26 | SHIH Christina | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 7% | |
27 | CALLAHAN Arrow | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 44% | 6% | |
28 | DONDERIS katherine | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
29 | HARKONEN Eemil | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
30 | BALAJI Tejas | 6% | 35% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
31 | STEWART Brian | 3% | 21% | 45% | 28% | 4% | - | |
32 | PIRRO Anton | 1% | 14% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
33 | NGUYEN Andy | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
34 | YUAN Erin | 25% | 48% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | 9% | 40% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | YANG Jenny J. | 7% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | |
37 | LIM Kai | 1% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
38 | SULLIVAN Axyl | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
39 | STOLL Fuller | 56% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | |
40 | AVIDANO Mason | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
41 | CROSS Phoenix | 37% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | GURKIN Justin | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
43 | VIDRINE Odile | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.