Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GRANT Lachlan K. | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 2 | LIU Jonathan C. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | ANDERSON Colton J. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 5 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 6 | LI Simon A. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 7 | UPTON Michael | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | YI Stephen K. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 9 | SEZER Kaya | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | ZHAO Jason L. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | RYAN Francis D. | V D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 12 | PITCHER Skylar L. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 14 | CAMERON Matt W. | D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | PAI Dong-Ying | D V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | NEWHARD Noah A. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V D V V D | D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 18 | BERGEN Thomas R. | V V D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 19 | OAKLAND Brennan D. | D D D V V V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 20 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | MILLER Douglas S. | D V V D D V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 22 | CAHILL Nicholas D. | D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 23 | NOVACHENKO Nestor V. | D D D V V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 24 | JAMISON-KOENIG Matthias (Thias) P. | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | CONWAY Brett | D D V D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 26 | LOUNDY Alexander J. | D V D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 27 | DECKER Evan M. | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | ANDERSON David C. | D D D V D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 29 | TIERNEY Luke | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | SINHA Verdhaan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 31 | MALARSKI Daniel | D D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 32 | DRIVER Samuel | D D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | REILLY James C. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 34 | GOODWIN Austin | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.