Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
| 2 | LIU Jonathan C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 3 | ANDERSON Colton J. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 5 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 14% |
| 6 | LI Simon A. | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 39% | 6% | |
| 7 | UPTON Michael | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | YI Stephen K. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | SEZER Kaya | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 10 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 11 | RYAN Francis D. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 12 | PITCHER Skylar L. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 31% | 6% |
| 13 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 14 | CAMERON Matt W. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 2% | |
| 15 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | NEWHARD Noah A. | - | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% | |
| 18 | BERGEN Thomas R. | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | OAKLAND Brennan D. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 20 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 1% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 21 | MILLER Douglas S. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 22 | CAHILL Nicholas D. | 6% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | NOVACHENKO Nestor V. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | JAMISON-KOENIG Matthias (Thias) P. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | CONWAY Brett | 30% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 26 | LOUNDY Alexander J. | 22% | 43% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 27 | DECKER Evan M. | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | ANDERSON David C. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 29 | TIERNEY Luke | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | SINHA Verdhaan | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | MALARSKI Daniel | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | DRIVER Samuel | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | REILLY James C. | 19% | 46% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 34 | GOODWIN Austin | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.