Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | CHO Tyler H. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 3 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | ZUBECK Dominic | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 5 | SCHULTZ Alex | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | SILVERS Noah E. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | MALYSZ Anthony J. | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 8 | XIAO Zherui | D D D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 9 | KELSEY Ryan | V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 10 | WOZNIAK David | V V D V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 11 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | V D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | MARTIN Liam N. | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 13 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | V V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 14 | MAURER Scott J. | V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 15 | TOPAZ Nicholas | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 16 | HERMANSON David B. | D V D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 17 | TANG William | V D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 18 | DENNIS Ethan | D D V V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 19 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | D V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 20 | BRENNAN Charles F. | V D V V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 21 | SYED Saif M. | D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 22 | LENDER David | D V D D D V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 23 | CORRALES Nikolas | D V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 24 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | V D D V D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 25 | KNECHT PRANGE Patrick | V D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | STANLEY Dominick | D D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 27 | DU Drake | D D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | HONG James | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 29 | OH Matthew M. | D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 29 | ROWE Jason | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | KENT Matthew | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | NICHOLS JR Cortez | V D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 33 | SANCHEZ Bryan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.