14th Annual Yellow Jacket Open

Senior Mixed Épée

Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 10:00 AM

Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) (Andy) - - - - 2% 23% 74%
2 JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
3 NORMAN Christian - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
3 LIN Kason - - 6% 25% 42% 25% 2%
5 RIGGINS Joshua - - 4% 18% 38% 32% 7%
6 GLENNON Sebastian J. - - - 5% 27% 49% 19%
7 GORDON Reis J. - - - 5% 25% 44% 25%
8 JAAFAR Omar - - 1% 6% 22% 41% 31%
9 WANG Maxwell L. - - - 2% 14% 40% 43%
10 OLIVERIUS Joseph W. - - - 1% 8% 37% 55%
11 ZHOU Alec Q. - - 3% 16% 38% 37% 5%
12 SHAW Ian - - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
13 SARIKONDA Akhil - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
14 ZHANG Eric - 3% 16% 36% 34% 10% -
15 VACCARO Dominick J. - 1% 7% 24% 37% 24% 5%
16 AWAN Saqlain A. - - 4% 20% 42% 30% 4%
17 MODULLA Yathin R. - - 1% 8% 35% 42% 15%
18 TREBON Hayden - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
19 ELLIOTT Wyatt - - 1% 7% 28% 43% 22%
20 KULIKOWSKI Adam J. - - - 5% 28% 51% 16%
21 NGUYEN Audrey - 1% 8% 27% 41% 20% 3%
22 WANG Bryan - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
23 ALLEY Everett T - - 1% 8% 33% 46% 12%
24 JACKSON James - - 2% 14% 36% 38% 9%
25 PARCELEWICZ John M. - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
26 DANZIG Jacob S. - - - - 2% 22% 75%
27 LABROZZI Aidan - - 3% 15% 39% 38% 6%
28 LIU Dylan Y. - 1% 5% 21% 38% 29% 6%
28 TURK Reggie - 11% 35% 36% 15% 3% -
30 SCALES Chad - - 2% 12% 33% 39% 14%
31 PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 3% -
32 WILLIAMS Eli 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
33 FERRARA Milo - 5% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
34 RAVI Arjun - - 4% 23% 47% 23% 3%
35 HWANG Brandon 9% 42% 36% 11% 2% - -
36 FREY Wayne N. - - - 4% 30% 46% 20%
37 WANG Aidan - 2% 13% 35% 36% 12% 1%
38 BROWN Hannah - 2% 27% 43% 23% 4% -
39 CORLEY Avery - 1% 6% 22% 37% 28% 7%
40 BERNSTEIN Stuart E. - 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
41 WOOLLEY Blake M. - - 2% 10% 30% 39% 19%
42 MIHILL Margaret 24% 47% 23% 5% - - -
43 SHAFRITZ Noah - 5% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1%
44 HWANG Aidan 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
45 HAWKINS Sophia 16% 35% 31% 14% 4% - -
46 WEBB Jacob T. - 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 4%
47 CARRIE Konnor 4% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
48 KRIEGER Jack 1% 11% 35% 38% 13% 1% -
48 TUCKER Evan 3% 21% 38% 28% 10% 2% -
50 KARRIEM Zainuddin 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% 1%
51 LEE Winston 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% - -
52 JEONG Arisu 21% 43% 27% 8% 1% - -
53 ZIMINSKY Karel M. - 2% 15% 35% 34% 12% 1%
54 MCFARLAND John G. 2% 16% 41% 33% 8% 1% -
54 BOLLE Elijah 2% 15% 39% 34% 10% 1% -
56 ATON Dave 1% 10% 39% 36% 13% 2% -
57 DAVIS Jonah 1% 9% 26% 36% 23% 5% -
57 JIANG Harry - 8% 40% 44% 7% - -
59 JAAFAR Hamza 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
60 CHEN Jordan - 6% 22% 37% 26% 8% 1%
61 LEE Aaron 2% 17% 38% 30% 11% 2% -
62 DAVIS Kelly 5% 36% 39% 16% 3% - -
63 DAVIDENKO Alexander 3% 17% 34% 31% 12% 2% -
64 WEDDLE Carson 6% 28% 39% 22% 5% - -
65 DUNKLIN Devon 2% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
66 DEMAREE Adam - 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 1%
67 KWON Jason 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% -
68 ADIBZADEH Mehrdad 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
69 PARK Andrew - 3% 22% 52% 20% 3% -
70 ROCKWELL Nolan 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
71 REDDY Daksh 1% 13% 37% 36% 11% 1% -
71 HAYES Zackery 22% 51% 23% 4% - - -
73 IYER Arjun 4% 20% 38% 30% 8% 1% -
74 EDWARDS Darby 3% 23% 54% 19% 2% - -
75 WANDMACHER GUERRERO Angela 3% 30% 40% 21% 5% - -
76 KIM Sangone 9% 46% 34% 9% 1% - -
77 SANCHEZ Jordan 3% 20% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
78 BELL Adam 11% 32% 35% 18% 4% - -
79 AGEE Brendon 40% 44% 14% 2% - - -
80 ARMES Maggie 40% 41% 16% 3% - - -
81 KIM Lauren 16% 39% 32% 12% 2% - -
82 ZHOU alex 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1% -
83 PETE Landon 48% 39% 11% 1% - - -
83 KNOX Aidan 21% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
85 VALENZUELA Elijah 55% 36% 8% 1% - - -
86 FRATTA Caterina 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
87 BASKIN Julia 49% 45% 6% - - - -
88 FORD Mattie 61% 34% 5% - - - -
89 TYMOFIEIEVA Arina 7% 29% 39% 20% 5% 1% -
90 DOUGLAS John 34% 46% 17% 2% - - -
91 CROSS Phoenix 39% 46% 14% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.