Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) (Andy) | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
2 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | V V V V V D | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | NORMAN Christian | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | LIN Kason | D V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
5 | RIGGINS Joshua | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
6 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
7 | GORDON Reis J. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
8 | JAAFAR Omar | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
9 | WANG Maxwell L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
11 | ZHOU Alec Q. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
12 | SHAW Ian | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
13 | SARIKONDA Akhil | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
14 | ZHANG Eric | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
15 | VACCARO Dominick J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
16 | AWAN Saqlain A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
17 | MODULLA Yathin R. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
18 | TREBON Hayden | V D V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
19 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | V D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
20 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
21 | NGUYEN Audrey | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
22 | WANG Bryan | V V D V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
23 | ALLEY Everett T | V D V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
24 | JACKSON James | V V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
25 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
26 | DANZIG Jacob S. | V V V D V D | V D | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
27 | LABROZZI Aidan | V D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
28 | LIU Dylan Y. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
28 | TURK Reggie | D V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
30 | SCALES Chad | D D D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
31 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | D V D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
32 | WILLIAMS Eli | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
33 | FERRARA Milo | V V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
34 | RAVI Arjun | V V D D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
35 | HWANG Brandon | D V V V D V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
36 | FREY Wayne N. | V V D D V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
37 | WANG Aidan | V D V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
38 | BROWN Hannah | V V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
39 | CORLEY Avery | V D V V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
40 | BERNSTEIN Stuart E. | V V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
41 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | D V V V D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
42 | MIHILL Margaret | D V V V D D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
43 | SHAFRITZ Noah | V V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
44 | HWANG Aidan | D D D V V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
45 | HAWKINS Sophia | D D V D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
46 | WEBB Jacob T. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
47 | CARRIE Konnor | V V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
48 | KRIEGER Jack | D V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
48 | TUCKER Evan | V V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
50 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | V D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
51 | LEE Winston | V V D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
52 | JEONG Arisu | D D V D V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
53 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | D D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
54 | MCFARLAND John G. | D D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
54 | BOLLE Elijah | D D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
56 | ATON Dave | D D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
57 | DAVIS Jonah | D D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
57 | JIANG Harry | D D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
59 | JAAFAR Hamza | D V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
60 | CHEN Jordan | V D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
61 | LEE Aaron | D V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
62 | DAVIS Kelly | D D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
63 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | V D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
64 | WEDDLE Carson | D D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
65 | DUNKLIN Devon | V V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
66 | DEMAREE Adam | D V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
67 | KWON Jason | D D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
68 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
69 | PARK Andrew | D D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
70 | ROCKWELL Nolan | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
71 | REDDY Daksh | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
71 | HAYES Zackery | D D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
73 | IYER Arjun | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
74 | EDWARDS Darby | V V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
75 | WANDMACHER GUERRERO Angela | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
76 | KIM Sangone | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
77 | SANCHEZ Jordan | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
78 | BELL Adam | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
79 | AGEE Brendon | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
80 | ARMES Maggie | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
81 | KIM Lauren | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
82 | ZHOU alex | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
83 | PETE Landon | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
83 | KNOX Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
85 | VALENZUELA Elijah | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
86 | FRATTA Caterina | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
87 | BASKIN Julia | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
88 | FORD Mattie | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
89 | TYMOFIEIEVA Arina | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
90 | DOUGLAS John | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
91 | CROSS Phoenix | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.