Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HWANG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 2 | RAVI Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 7% |
| 3 | MARSHALL Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | ROCKWELL Nolan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
| 5 | LEE Aaron | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 6 | KUCIA Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 7 | FERRARA Milo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
| 8 | HUGHES Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 9 | BERNSTEIN Stuart E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 10 | KRIEGER Jack | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | JEONG Arisu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 12 | FORD Tillman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 13 | HWANG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
| 15 | PETE Landon | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 17 | PAYNE Gareth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% |
| 18 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 19 | ZHOU alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 20 | TURK Reggie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 21 | CARRIE Konnor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 22 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 23 | KIM Sangone | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | JAAFAR Hamza | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | MUNAGAPATI Vishwa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 26 | WRIGHT Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 27 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 28 | WANDMACHER GUERRERO Angela | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LIANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | HAWKINS Sophia | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | RAMIREZ Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | PAKULATH Nihal | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | LIU Elinda | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | ILENRE Roni | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 35 | OTERO Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | CORLEY Avery | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 37 | REDDY Daksh | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | YANG Maximus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 39 | SEATON Jake | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 41 | TAK Jemi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 42 | BASKIN Julia | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | ATON Dave | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 8% | |
| 44 | DEMAREE Adam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% | |
| 45 | BONNER Cohen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 10% |
| 46 | BOLLE Elijah | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 47 | TUCKER Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 48 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 49 | LEE Winston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
| 50 | MCFARLAND John G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 51 | OLSON Clayton M. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HARTIGAN Joe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 53 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | ZIELINSKI Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 55 | FRAGER Soleil | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | DANDRIDGE Laila | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | WILLIAMS Eli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 58 | ELEY Ellis | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | DUNKLIN Devon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 19% | 3% |
| 60 | JIANG Harry | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 61 | DOUGLAS John | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | BARRETT John | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | HAYES Zackery | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | DAVIS Shanna | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | IYER Arjun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 66 | PIERCE Chandon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 67 | ANDERSON Pierson | 100% | 99% | 69% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | RIGSBEE Rachel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 69 | BELL Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 70 | FRATTA Caterina | 100% | 99% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 71 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | ARMES Maggie | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | CHAVEZ Leontine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 74 | AGUILLON Alexis | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 75 | SANCHEZ Jordan | 100% | 97% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 76 | FORD Mattie | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | SHADOFF Samantha | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 78 | SHAKULA Matvey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 79 | KNOX Aidan | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 80 | STEWART Sarah | 100% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | BARRETT John | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | DOSS matthew | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 83 | TYMOFIEIEVA Arina | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | KARTHIKEYAKANNAN Madhav | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 85 | WATKINS Robert | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | AGEE Brendon | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | VALENZUELA Elijah | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | LEWIS Katherine | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.