Oregon Convention Center - Portland, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
2 | KIM Junseong | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
3 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
3 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
5 | HENDERSON Louis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | |
6 | YI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
7 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
8 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
9 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
10 | ZONG Shiyan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
11 | LU Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% |
12 | KOREN George | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% | |
13 | KAUL Ishaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
14 | ALUF William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
15 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
16 | ZHANG Caleb | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
17 | FENG Ledi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
18 | LAI Mars | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
19 | 曾 ZIMO | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
20 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | |
21 | KIM Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
22 | WANG David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
23 | ZALETAEV Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
24 | ZHANG Weihang | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
25 | LEVY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 3% | |
26 | HAGN Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | 1% | |
27 | DENG Richard | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
28 | ARTETA-CHEVALIER Ulysse | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
29 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
30 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | MAKLIN David | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
32 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% | |
33 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
34 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
35 | QIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | |
36 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
37 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
38 | SABINO Bennett | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
39 | TABANCAY Cole | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% | |
40 | QI Zach | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
41 | DUFF Michael | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
42 | STYS Owen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
43 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
44 | JI Derek | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
45 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
46 | BADMUS David | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
47 | LUO Gavin | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
48 | FAN Yuen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
49 | DING Orlando | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | |
50 | WANG Henrik | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
51 | YE Aaron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
52 | O'KEEFE Brody | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
53 | FAVO Christopher | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
54 | MOODY-FUENTES Nelson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
55 | TAN Daniel | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
56 | SHARMA Ayaan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
57 | MALLARD Arthur | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
58 | LVOVSKIY Roman | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
59 | ZHAO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
60 | LIU Nico | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
61 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
62 | HE Richard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
63 | RINALDI Benigno | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
64 | LOVELL Jackson | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
65 | WANG James | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
66 | HSIEH Maxwell | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
67 | PEARL Gavin | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
68 | LUO Winston | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
69 | JASPERSON Nolan | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
70 | YANG Aegon | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
71 | ZHEN Felix | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
72 | HADFIELD Gavin | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
73 | LI Linus | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
74 | YANG cyrus | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
75 | MISHRA Ayan | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | |
76 | CHIDAMBARAM Nivedh | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
77 | ZHANG Mark | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
78 | LIM Jun Rui | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.