Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 2 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 3 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 3 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 5 | SNIDER Margot (Maggie) | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 6 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 7 | AHUJA Arianna | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 8 | RUSSELL Renata | - | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | ANDERSON Nora E. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 11 | LURYE Sarah | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 12 | TYLER Syd | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 13 | MYLER AnneMarie | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% |
| 14 | SEMIKIN Julia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 15 | NING Emma | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 16 | KIM Erika S. | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | WANG anne | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 18 | BELSLEY Devon K. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 19 | WU Fan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | BOTNER Olivia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 9% |
| 22 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | 1% | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 25 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 26 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | COVITZ Ashley A. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 10% |
| 29 | BURN Lauren M. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 30 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SAMANDAS Jackelyn | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | DUTTA Amelia | 31% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HONG Elaine | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ROBERTSON Lily | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 35 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 36 | BOLES Savvianna | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | STOCK Olivia | 48% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | OH Kaitlin Y. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | JANNEY Erynn "Renn" | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | OLEDZKA Julia | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | GLICK Nina | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.