Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
2 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | D D D V D | V V V V V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
3 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | D V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
3 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | V D V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
5 | SNIDER Margot (Maggie) | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
7 | AHUJA Arianna | V D V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
8 | RUSSELL Renata | D D D V D D | V V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
9 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
10 | ANDERSON Nora E. | V V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
11 | LURYE Sarah | V V V V D D | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
12 | TYLER Syd | D D V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
13 | MYLER AnneMarie | V V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | SEMIKIN Julia | V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
15 | NING Emma | V V V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
16 | KIM Erika S. | D V D D D | V V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
17 | WANG anne | V V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
18 | BELSLEY Devon K. | D V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
19 | WU Fan | V V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
20 | BOTNER Olivia | D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
21 | MEHROTRA Anya | D V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
22 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
23 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | V V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
24 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | D D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
25 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | V D V D V D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
26 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | V V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
27 | COVITZ Ashley A. | D D D V V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
28 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | V V D D D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
29 | BURN Lauren M. | V D D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
30 | SCHULTZ Gillian | D D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
31 | SAMANDAS Jackelyn | V D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
32 | DUTTA Amelia | D V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
33 | HONG Elaine | D V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
34 | ROBERTSON Lily | D D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
35 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | D D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
36 | BOLES Savvianna | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
37 | STOCK Olivia | D D D D V V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
38 | OH Kaitlin Y. | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
39 | JANNEY Erynn "Renn" | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
40 | OLEDZKA Julia | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
41 | GLICK Nina | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.