Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 2 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | SUGIURA Samuel | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 3 | LAUB William | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 5 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% | |
| 6 | LIU Kevin | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 7 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 3% | 23% | 46% | 27% | |||
| 8 | YOOK Isaac | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 9 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 10 | EYBELMAN Ariel | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 33% | 26% | 8% |
| 11 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
| 12 | KATZ Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
| 13 | GONG Jerry | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 14 | KIM Theodore | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% | |
| 15 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 16 | SHINCHUK Daniel | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | PINTO Marcus | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 18 | BRANDT Jaden | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 19 | WONG Max | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | |
| 21 | HO Nathaniel | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 22 | SUBA Lucas | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 23 | UEMOTO Ken | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
| 24 | DEELY Hartigan | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | HERR Gabriele | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | PEREIRA Beckham | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 27 | MARGULIS Jared | 3% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | SADHU Neiyam | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | HENDERSON Lucas | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 30 | CHAKRAVORTY Sohan | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | BAI Evan | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 32 | NG Timothy | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 33 | OH Aster | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 34 | POWER Alex | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | SHAH Sohan | 7% | 34% | 43% | 16% | |||
| 36 | CHEN Samuel | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 7% | |
| 37 | WONG Caleb W. | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | MEYERSON Jacob | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 39 | WAXLER Ryan | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | - | 4% | 14% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 4% |
| 41 | KALOUDIS Sean | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | FERTIL Ethan | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MUNJULURI Ruhaan | 5% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | LIU Andrew | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | CAMPBELL Tobias | 1% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 46 | PORTER Dupree | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 47 | LEE Anderson | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | JAIN Karanvir | 53% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |||
| 49 | ONG Dylan | 5% | 32% | 45% | 18% | |||
| 50 | O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan | 4% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 51 | ZHANG Ray | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | KIARA Kinoti | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 53 | SUN Andrew | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 54 | WU Timothy | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | AYDOGDU Hakan | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 56 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | LEE Damian | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | SARWAHI Viraat | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | MAGITSKY Isaac | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | GUEVARA Alexander | 56% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.