Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
2 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
3 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
3 | LAUB William | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
5 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | |
6 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
7 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 27% | |||
8 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
9 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
10 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 8% |
11 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
12 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
13 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
14 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% | |
15 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
16 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
17 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
18 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% | |
19 | WONG Max | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
20 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
21 | HO Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
22 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
23 | UEMOTO Ken | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% | |
24 | DEELY Hartigan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
25 | HERR Gabriele | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
26 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
27 | MARGULIS Jared | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
28 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
29 | HENDERSON Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
30 | CHAKRAVORTY Sohan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
31 | BAI Evan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
32 | NG Timothy | 100% | 95% | 74% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
33 | OH Aster | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
34 | POWER Alex | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
35 | SHAH Sohan | 100% | 93% | 59% | 16% | |||
36 | CHEN Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
37 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | - | |
38 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
39 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
40 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 4% |
41 | KALOUDIS Sean | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
42 | FERTIL Ethan | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
43 | MUNJULURI Ruhaan | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
44 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
45 | CAMPBELL Tobias | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
46 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
47 | LEE Anderson | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
48 | JAIN Karanvir | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | |||
49 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 95% | 63% | 18% | |||
50 | O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
51 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
52 | KIARA Kinoti | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
53 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
54 | WU Timothy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
55 | AYDOGDU Hakan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
56 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
57 | LEE Damian | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
58 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
59 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 78% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
60 | MAGITSKY Isaac | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
61 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
62 | GUEVARA Alexander | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.