Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
| 2 | LIU Eva | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 3 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
| 3 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 46% | 30% |
| 5 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 71% |
| 6 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
| 7 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% |
| 8 | LI Savannah | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 34% | 3% |
| 9 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 10 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
| 11 | CAO Amelie | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | DONG Iris | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 34% |
| 13 | CHOI Cara | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | EPSTEIN Naomi | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 15 | BRADSHAW Tamira | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | GE Deanna | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 17 | LIN Yunong | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 23% |
| 18 | DINAR Julia | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 19 | SHUTZER Lily | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 20 | LAU Victoria | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 21 | GOODMAN Carden | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LEO Jenna | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | SHANG Arianna | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | YOUM Amelia | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | ZHANG Caroline | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 26 | LIN Zhishan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | ZHU Ella | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | YEH Constance | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | HEMPHILL Mia | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 32 | BO Iris | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | BENTLEY Amelia | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 34 | ZHENG Annalyn | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | DONG Katelyn | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | KOESTERS Florentine | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | CHAN Jolene | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 40 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | PAEK Mila | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | IM Charlotte | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.