Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 2 | TAYCHER Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 3 | ROPER F. Elijah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 3 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | LIN Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% |
| 6 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 7 | AGARWAAL Yohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 8 | BIVIJI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 9 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 10 | MALEK Zak | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 11% | 2% |
| 11 | WU Vincent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 12 | SO Morgan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | FOUX Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| 15 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 9% |
| 16 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% |
| 17 | HU Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 18 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 19 | HENDERSON Louis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 20 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 21 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 22 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 23 | BURENKOV Matthew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 24 | SAGE Nikolai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 25 | CUSSON William | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LEE Blake | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 17% | 1% |
| 27 | BEAL Colton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 28 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 29 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 9% |
| 30 | WONG Reagan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | EARLEY Jack | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 33 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 35 | KOREN George | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 36 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | FRANCOIS Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 38 | CHEN Anson | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | SUH Leo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | LEVY Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 43 | BRADY Jack | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 45 | MELE Gianni | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 46 | LIUZHANG Ben | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | NARAYAN Rishi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | YAO John | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | STOLCKE Julian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | SUBA Mason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 52 | ZALETAEV Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 53 | FIELDS Eli | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 54 | HAGN Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 55 | RIVERATAN Darshan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 56 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 57 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | ALUF Brendon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 59 | NG Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 60 | VISH Manyu | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 61 | ZHAO Owen | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | DATTILIO Aidan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 63 | HAHN Ever | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 64 | CARR Silas | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 65 | KOREN David | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 66 | DY Azriel | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | HALUSKA Rex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 68 | TERENTIEV Michael | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 69 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 70 | HALACSY Edomer | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | WEI Hunter | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 72 | MAKLIN David | 100% | 89% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | SOCHNIKOV Jacob | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 74 | RISMAN Edward | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 75 | LEE Jeffrey | 100% | 96% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 76 | HATCH Oliver | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 77 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | KATZ Isaac | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | GUEGAN Gabriel | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | ALLEN Parker | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 81 | LONGCORE Daniel | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | JACOBS Eitan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 83 | MERZLYAKOV VLadimir | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 84 | JIN Michael | 100% | 96% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 85 | HUANG Lucas | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | LI kevin | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | GILBERT Ari | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | GU Viljo Weihan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 89 | ZHANG Mark | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | BLACK Bauer | 100% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.