Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VAROQUA Nalby | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 2 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 3 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 3 | DEPEW Spencer | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 5 | MORALES Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 6 | MEYERSON Jacob | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 7 | CHEN Samuel | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 8 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 9 | ENGEL Peter | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% |
| 10 | OH Aster | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | GINSBERG Jordan | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 13 | SAVOY Luca | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 14 | WANG Weiyun | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | BRANDT Jaden | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 16 | KIM Theodore | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | KATZ Ryan | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 18 | LIU Kevin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 19 | HO Jacob | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 20 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 21 | DOWNEY Baran | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 22 | LEE Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 23 | DIMATTEO Michael | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | MCCARTHY Devan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 25 | TAUER Sam | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 26 | CHEN Jonathan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 27 | SUN Andrew | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | AYDOGDU Hakan | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 29 | BUCK Maximilian | 27% | 40% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | TOZZI Massimo | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | XU Justin | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | GONG Jerry | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 34 | PINTO Marcus | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 35 | FELDMAN Drew | - | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 36 | ONG Dylan | 3% | 19% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | COUNTS Nicholas | - | 8% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HENDERSON Lucas | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | LEE Anderson | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | UEMOTO Ken | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 41 | BODKIN Jake M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 42 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 43 | LAUB William | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 43 | GONG zihao | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
| 45 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 46 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 21% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | HUANG Connor | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 48 | SUBA Lucas | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 49 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | KALOUDIS Sean | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | MATTINGLY Ian | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | CHAKRAVORTY Sohan | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | MARGULIS Jared | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | KOGAN Nikita | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 56 | WEISS Toby | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 57 | WU Timothy | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | FERTIL Ethan | 14% | 58% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | WEBER Mattias A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 60 | JACQUES Hugo | 34% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 61 | MAMKIN Nathan | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | JAIN Karanvir | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.