The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

2024 Winter Thrust RYC/RJCC

Cadet Women's Saber

Sunday, February 4, 2024 at 10:30 AM

Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 CHAVAN Arya V D V V V V V V V V V V 4.5 5 +0.5
2 CHIARELLI Valentina V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
3 MARYASH Samantha D V D V V V V V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
3 TA-ZHOU Emma V D V D V V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
5 ATTIA Jasmine V V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
6 DAMBAL Sasha D V V V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
7 MYAT Chloe V D V D V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
8 ZHANG Sophie D D V D V V V V V D 5.2 3 -2.2
9 HENRY Soraya S. V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
10 BUSH Bethany D V V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
11 FREEMAN Armine V V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
12 SHINCHUK Ellisha D V V V D D V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
13 SHELLEY Scarlett D V V D V D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
14 MACKAY Katherine V D V D D V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
15 UEMOTO Lynn D V D D D V V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
16 MAK Kaitlin D D V D D V V V D 2.4 1 -1.4
17 GUVEN Coco V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
18 CHIANG Melissa V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
19 NICHOLAS Eva V D V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
20 NAYAK Esha V V V V V D V D 4.0 5 +1.0
21 NEUMAN Ella V D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
22 IANNUZZI Lucy V V V V D V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
23 NIU Jessica V V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
24 HUANG Doris V V D V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
25 KANDADAI Lara V V D V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
26 SHMULER Fiona D V V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
27 RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. V D V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
28 LEOU Korina V D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
29 LEE Kaitlin D V V D V V D 1.5 3 +1.5
30 LEIGH Adalene V D D V D V V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
31 BROWN Aria D V V D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
32 KHOST Maeve D D D D V D V V D 2.6 1 -1.6
33 BAINS Nandini V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
34 HU Anna V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
35 GUGALA Hanna V V D V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
36 KRASOWITZ Lucy V V V V D D 2.6 4 +1.4
37 CROOKS Riley V V V V D D 3.1 4 +0.9
38 KALINICHENKO Yekaterina V V D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
39 REN Katherine D V V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
40 AWAD Royce D V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
41 LIU Kelly V V V V D D D 3.7 4 +0.3
42 PASUPULETI Laya V V D D V V D 1.6 4 +2.4
43 BERRIOS Catalina V V D V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
44 LOO Kaitlyn V V D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
45 CHOI Charlotte D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
46 KIM Audrey D V D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
47 ZHANG Ashley V D D V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
48 MONTORIO Lily M. V D V D V D D 4.2 3 -1.2
49 KWON Ava V V D V D D D 3.9 3 -0.9
50 GUHA Surabhi D V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
51 HANLON Lucy D D D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
52 ONG Lauren V D V D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
53 STADNIK Emilia D V D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
54 BORGUETA Madison D D D V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
55 WANG JiaQi V V D D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
56 MARGULIAN Maria D V D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
57 SRINATH Lyra A. D V V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
58 DONG Angel V D V D D D V D 4.6 2 -2.6
59 XU Elaine D D V D V D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
60 XU Demi D V D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
61 TIAN Cynthia D D D V V D 2.1 1 -1.1
62 BAIK Sarah V D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
63 MANSPERGER Gia V D D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
64 WONG Charlene D D V D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
65 COLE Beatrice D D V D V D 0.5 2 +1.5
66 HO Sophia V D D D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
67 ROBERTSON Szilvia D D V V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
68 CHOU Zoe V D D D D D 3.3 1 -2.3
69 PROZUMENT Elizabeth D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
70 DESAUTELS Alexandra D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
71 VISWANATHAN Nishka V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
72 HUANG Zoe D D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
73 SIMMONS Kinley D V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
73 REKHTMAN Alice D D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
75 CHURCH Madeline D D D D D V D 0.4 1 +0.6
76 PALEY Alisa D V D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
77 LEE Kaelyn D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
78 GALLANT Justine D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
79 FIGELMAN Maya D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
80 LAGOON Miriam D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
81 KESSLER Amelia D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
82 GETZONI Mary D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
83 RIFKIN Lielle D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.