Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 2 | NING Emma | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 7% |
| 3 | LUONG Shirley | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 3 | SCALA Emma | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 5 | DUNLAP-SMITH Azaline I. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 6 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | TYLER Syd | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 8 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 9 | FALINSKA Julia | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
| 10 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 11 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 12 | SZPAK Lara K. | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 15 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 24% | |
| 16 | RUSSELL Renata | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | MYLER AnneMarie | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 18 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 19 | WANG anne | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 20 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 21 | AHUJA Arianna | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 22 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% |
| 23 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 26 | WALLACE Katherine C. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | GUPTA Ananya B. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 29 | KIM Natalie S. | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | BECKER Carson E. | 19% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | BOTNER Olivia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WEISS Rachel | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | LOMBARD Ella | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 35 | SNIDER Margot (Maggie) | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 36 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | ROBERTSON Lily | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 38 | BERDICHEVSKY Adelle M. | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 40 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | - | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 41 | KIM Erika S. | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 43 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | BURN Lauren M. | - | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 45 | WU Fan | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | DU Yiyun (Doreen) | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | DRAYTON Hannah | 33% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | HONG Elaine | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | BOLES Savvianna | 14% | 51% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | OH Kaitlin Y. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | SAMANDAS Jackelyn | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | WU Meiye (Mia) | 47% | 47% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.