Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 7% |
| 3 | LUONG Shirley | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 3 | SCALA Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 5 | DUNLAP-SMITH Azaline I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
| 6 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 7 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 8 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 9 | FALINSKA Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 10 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% | |
| 11 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 12 | SZPAK Lara K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 13 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 15 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | |
| 16 | RUSSELL Renata | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | MYLER AnneMarie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 18 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 19 | WANG anne | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 9% | |
| 20 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 21 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 22 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 23 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | SEMIKIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
| 26 | WALLACE Katherine C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | GUPTA Ananya B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 29 | KIM Natalie S. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | BECKER Carson E. | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | BOTNER Olivia | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WEISS Rachel | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | LOMBARD Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 35 | SNIDER Margot (Maggie) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 36 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 37 | ROBERTSON Lily | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 38 | BERDICHEVSKY Adelle M. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 40 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 41 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 43 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | BURN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 45 | WU Fan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 46 | DU Yiyun (Doreen) | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | DRAYTON Hannah | 100% | 67% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | BOLES Savvianna | 100% | 86% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | OH Kaitlin Y. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | SAMANDAS Jackelyn | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | WU Meiye (Mia) | 100% | 53% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.