Walter E Washington Convention Center - Washington D.C, DC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 2 | YANG Alisa | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
| 3 | SHU Youshan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 34% | 3% |
| 5 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 6 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
| 7 | WANG Zoe | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 8 | LI Fei | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 9 | LEE Scarlett | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 10 | YOU Emily | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 11 | YOUNG VIVIAN | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 12 | DESAI Meera P. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% |
| 13 | XIONG Angelica | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 35% | 6% |
| 14 | PRESMAN Aerin | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 15 | QI Julieanne | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | GANSER Nicole | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 17 | JIN Zhengtian | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | < 1% |
| 18 | SONG Angela | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 19 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 20 | AI Amy | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 28% | |
| 21 | GUO Luxi | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 22 | KUMAR Eva | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 23 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 24 | WANG Victoria | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
| 25 | XU Serena | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 27 | LAI Amanda | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | CAMPBELL Eva | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 29 | KUMAR Anusha | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | ZHANG Caroline | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | WU Michelle | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 32 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | BUSH emma | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 34 | SEREGIN Katya | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 35 | WANG Angelina | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | TANG Elaine | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | CHUNG Penelope | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 38 | SUN Zeyu | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 39 | DALEY Keira | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 40 | BARTOSZUK Camilla | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | ILYAS Ayah | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | HICKS Grace | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 43 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 44 | CHANG Chloe | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 46 | NELSON Grace E. | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | PATIL Amulya | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% | |
| 48 | PULLEN Ayah | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | BASRALIAN Azniv | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | JAKEL Alysa C. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | CHI Chelsea | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 52 | COLELLA Lauren | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | KAUR Manroop | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | GARIKIPATI Thansi | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 56 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | NIX Reagan | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 57 | WEI Sherry | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | BO GENESIS | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 22% | |
| 61 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 62 | READ Lyla | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | LIN Victoria T. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 64 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LI Yixin Catherine | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 66 | BLANCO Ariia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | TAM Connie | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | WOOLF Fredrika | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 69 | LI Caroline | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | SU Evelyn | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 71 | BARDIN Kira | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | LY Hannah | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | BI Michelle | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 74 | FLITMAN Gabrielle | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 76 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 77 | GAN Shelby | 33% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 78 | FANG Jocelyn | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 79 | MURPHY Katherine | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 80 | MISHIMA Audrey | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 81 | BARG Daniella | - | < 1% | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 82 | CHUANG Ramona | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 83 | CHEN Alicia | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 84 | PILSON Rebecca | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 85 | HE Lizbeth | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | TANG Ellen | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | GAVASHELI Margarita | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | FAKTOR Emily | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 89 | GUAN Isabella | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 90 | RICHARDS Axelle | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | PEELER Julia | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 92 | PENHOET Evelyn | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 93 | LEEB Zoe | 43% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.