Walter E Washington Convention Center - Washington D.C, DC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
2 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
3 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
3 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 3% |
5 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
6 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
7 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
8 | LI Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
9 | LEE Scarlett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
10 | YOU Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
11 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
12 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
13 | XIONG Angelica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 6% |
14 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
15 | QI Julieanne | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
16 | GANSER Nicole | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | JIN Zhengtian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
18 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
19 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
20 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
21 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
22 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% | |
23 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
24 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
25 | XU Serena | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
26 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
27 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | CAMPBELL Eva | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
29 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
30 | ZHANG Caroline | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
31 | WU Michelle | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
32 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
33 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
34 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
35 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
36 | TANG Elaine | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
37 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
38 | SUN Zeyu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
39 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
40 | BARTOSZUK Camilla | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
41 | ILYAS Ayah | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
42 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
43 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
44 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
44 | CHANG Chloe | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
46 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
47 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
48 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
49 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
50 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
51 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | |
52 | COLELLA Lauren | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
53 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
54 | GARIKIPATI Thansi | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
55 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
56 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
57 | NIX Reagan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
57 | WEI Sherry | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | BO GENESIS | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
60 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% | |
61 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
62 | READ Lyla | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
63 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
64 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
65 | LI Yixin Catherine | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
66 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | TAM Connie | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
68 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
69 | LI Caroline | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
70 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
71 | BARDIN Kira | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
72 | LY Hannah | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
73 | BI Michelle | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
74 | FLITMAN Gabrielle | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
75 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
76 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
77 | GAN Shelby | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
78 | FANG Jocelyn | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
79 | MURPHY Katherine | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
80 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
81 | BARG Daniella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 27% | |
82 | CHUANG Ramona | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
83 | CHEN Alicia | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
84 | PILSON Rebecca | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
85 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
86 | TANG Ellen | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
87 | GAVASHELI Margarita | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
88 | FAKTOR Emily | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
89 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
90 | RICHARDS Axelle | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
91 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
92 | PENHOET Evelyn | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
93 | LEEB Zoe | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.