Bill Garrett Fieldhouse Room 293 - Bloomington, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MASON Zander | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
2 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 42% |
3 | CHO Jeremy | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% | |
3 | BAMPTON Nicholas | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
5 | WU Byron | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
6 | KRAJ Pawel | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
7 | CARR David | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
8 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 5% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 1% | |
9 | STENNIS Brendan | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
10 | STOCK Olivia | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
11 | MILLER Daniel | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
12 | BROWN-GRIMM Carl | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
13 | PAPASDENNERLINE Jake | 1% | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
14 | HERSCOVICI Aaron | 7% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 1% | |
15 | CARDENAS Nathan | - | 8% | 36% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
16 | HEZLEP Norman | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
17 | WANG Peter | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
18 | MILLER Brent | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | LASKA Patryk | 1% | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - |
20 | VAN DYK Mark | 10% | 38% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
21 | JOHNSON James | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
22 | FULLER II Thomas | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | |
23 | TARR Robert | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
23 | IDERIS Rifhan | 6% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
25 | YOO Brandon | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
26 | SPURGEON William | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | HAFERTEPEN Emily | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | LIU Sandra | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
29 | ZELLMER Kellen | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.