Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 2 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 3 | WANG Alice | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
| 3 | LI YING CHU | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 5 | HUANG MADELINE | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 6 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 7 | BROCK Sydney | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
| 8 | CONG Anne | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 9 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 10 | KINKADE Ellie | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 11 | LO Chloe | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
| 12 | GOLOVITSER Maya | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 13 | GOMES Diana C. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 14 | SAYSON Andrea | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 15 | HAN Emma | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | STONE Coral | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 17 | DIECK Miranda P. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 18 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | SCHOEW Margot | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 21 | LOMOTAN Addison | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 22 | DANG Kelia | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 23 | TURIANO Nadelle | 3% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 24 | MAO Elsa | 3% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 26 | XA-CHIN Sara | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 27 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | CHEN Elaine | - | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | HU Michelle | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 30 | SHEARER Alena | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | BORDAS HILL Georgiana | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | MAO anna | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KIM Satie | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 34 | JOHNSON Aven | 2% | 34% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | IYER Arushi | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 36 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | NING Lynn | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | YUEN Nicole | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 39 | SENGUPTA Jia | - | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | WONG Cerise | 11% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | TEYSSIER Katherine | - | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 42 | KIRBY Skye | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | SEIGEL Norah | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | LIU Hannah | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | PATIL Jyothi | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | CAI Veronica | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | PHAN Genevieve | 21% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | WANG Jiayi | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 48 | DANG Madeleine | 42% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | CAO arissa | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | PANCHAL Arya | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 53 | WALLIS Allie | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.