Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 2 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
| 3 | WANG Alice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 3 | LI YING CHU | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 5 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
| 6 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 7 | BROCK Sydney | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 8 | CONG Anne | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 9 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
| 10 | KINKADE Ellie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 11 | LO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% | |
| 12 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 13 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 14 | SAYSON Andrea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 15 | HAN Emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | STONE Coral | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 17 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 18 | KU Alathea-Joy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | SCHOEW Margot | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 21 | LOMOTAN Addison | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 23 | TURIANO Nadelle | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 24 | MAO Elsa | 100% | 97% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 26 | XA-CHIN Sara | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | |
| 27 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | HU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 30 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 31 | BORDAS HILL Georgiana | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | MAO anna | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KIM Satie | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 34 | JOHNSON Aven | 100% | 98% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | IYER Arushi | 100% | 99% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 36 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | NING Lynn | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 38 | YUEN Nicole | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 39 | SENGUPTA Jia | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | WONG Cerise | 100% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | TEYSSIER Katherine | 100% | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 42 | KIRBY Skye | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | SEIGEL Norah | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 44 | LIU Hannah | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 45 | PATIL Jyothi | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | CAI Veronica | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | PHAN Genevieve | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 48 | DANG Madeleine | 100% | 58% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | CAO arissa | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | PANCHAL Arya | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 53 | WALLIS Allie | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.