The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

2024 Bama Open

Mixed Épée

Sunday, March 24, 2024 at 10:00 AM

University of Alabama Student Recreation Center - Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 GORDON Reis V V V V V V V V V V V V 6.9 7 +0.1
2 ELLIOTT Wyatt V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.9 7 +1.1
3 WEBB Jacob V V V V D V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
3 SOPER Adam D V V V V V V V V V D 3.5 6 +2.5
5 HUTTO Joshua V V V V V V V V V D 6.0 7 +1.0
6 PAYNE Gareth V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
7 YANAMANDRA Sidhansh V D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
8 JOHNSON Soren V D D D V D D V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
9 TUCKER Evan V V V D V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
10 SUNDQUIST Matthew V D V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
11 CALINSKY Edward V V V D V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
12 KERTESZ Stefan V V D V V D V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
13 FORD Tillman V D V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
14 WILLIAMS Eli D V V V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
15 DUNKLIN Devon V V V D D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
16 DONG Joshua V V V D V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
17 RAY William V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
18 LEE Aaron D D V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
19 CRAIG Alexander D V V D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
20 PARCELEWICZ John V D D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
21 PUVALOWSKI Ryan V V D D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
22 ZIELINSKI Alexander V V V V D D D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
23 MACGREGOR Alexander D V D V V V D V D 3.7 4 +0.3
24 TURK Reggie D V D V V D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
25 BROWN Hannah D D V V V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
26 SEATON Jake V D V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
27 KEMLE Brian V V D V D D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
28 KNOX Aidan V V D D V D V D 1.5 3 +1.5
29 HAYES Zackery D V V V D D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
30 TEGERT Emma V D V V D D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
31 JOHNSON Grady V V D D D D V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
32 JOHNSTON Jacob D D D V D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
33 KARRIEM Zainuddin V V V D D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
34 BROWN Matt D D V V V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
35 BARRON Grayson V D D D V D D 4.0 2 -2.0
36 SIMPSON John D D D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
37 OGLE Bennett D V D D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
38 WILLIAMS Joe D V D D D V D D 2.8 2 -0.8
39 GAYFORD Zachary D D V D V D D D 4.0 2 -2.0
40 ARNOLD Samuel V D D D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
41 NIST Carter D D D V V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
42 STUESSY Nolan D D D D V D D 2.7 1 -1.7
43 CARRUTH Mae D D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
44 BACARISSE Nicholas D D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
45 HAUSER Samuel D D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
46 WENTWORTH Ashley D D V D D D D 1.0 1 -
47 PARKER Jordan D D V D D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
48 BARRETT John V D D D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
49 BENJAMIN John D D D D D V D D 2.8 1 -1.8
50 BRELAND craig D D D D D D D 2.9 0 -2.9
51 FULLER Patrick D D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
52 STEELE Alexis D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.