George Mason Recreational Athletics Complex (RAC) - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WALLACE George | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | HU Alexander W. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | WOODLEY George | D D V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 3 | KELLOFF Michael | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 5 | TANG Justin | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 6 | MARKOWITZ Sam | V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | STULAK Brendan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | BARTLETT Lauren | V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | TRITHART Jacob M. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | WHEELER Andreas | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 11 | LUNDEN Espen | D V V D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 12 | HIGGINS Jackie | D V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 13 | HAYES Nathan P. | D V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 14 | WU Shaochi | D V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | LUCOT Benjamin | V D D V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | SIMS Martin L. | D V D D D | V V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 17 | PERILLO Edoardo Filippo Mihai | V V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 | |
| 18 | MCCABE Kian | V V V V D V | D | 1.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
| 19 | CHUNG Henry | V V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | SZIEDE Kieran | V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | BARDIN Kira | V V V D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 22 | SJOBERG Samuel | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 23 | CAMPBELL Paul | V V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 24 | DHINDHWAL KULBIR SINGH | V D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 25 | CANDELARIA Armando | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 26 | SCHICKEL Juliana | V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 27 | DREYER Nadia S. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | BENSON Charlotte | D V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 29 | BUTLER Kenny | V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 30 | BADLANI Neel | V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 31 | MOLINA Rommel | V D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 32 | GIAMPETRO Nicholas | D D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 33 | BOCK Christopher | D V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 34 | WRIGHT Madison | V D D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 35 | KARASICK Andrew | D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 36 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | D D V D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 37 | D'ANGELO Olivia | V D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 38 | DIX Philip-Alexander | D D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 39 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | D V V D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 40 | THOMAS Charlie | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 41 | JARRATT Isaac | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 42 | PRESBY Alison | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 43 | WATSON Taylor | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | AVALOS Sofia | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 45 | KLAUSEN Seth | D D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 46 | MEMON Insha | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 47 | DODSON Mary Kathryn | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 48 | VASQUEZ Jonathan | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 49 | ROGERS Mark | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 50 | PREGEL Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
| 51 | RAMIREZ Brooklyn | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.