Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | PAMERLEAU Ian | V D V V V | V V V V | 4.0 | 4 | - |
2 | GUILFORD Corey | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
3 | RIPLEY Ian | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
3 | LAUER Michael | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
5 | MBERIA Alexander | V V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
6 | MACNEIL Matthew | V V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
7 | REED Dusty (Allen) | D D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
8 | BRENNEMAN Adam | V V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
9 | STAUBITZ Marc | V V D D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
10 | KRAVITZ Sarah | V V D V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
11 | STOKELL Parker | D V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
12 | BRETHAUER Adah | V D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
13 | VAN DYK Mark | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
14 | FAENOVA Alexandra | V D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
15 | REEN Stephen | D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
16 | SABOL Nathaniel | D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
17 | MACNEIL Sydney | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
18 | HENDERSON Emery | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
19 | HETRICK Owen | V D D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
20 | DUTTON Kimberly | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
---|---|---|
Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.