Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAMERLEAU Ian | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 2 | GUILFORD Corey | - | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 3 | RIPLEY Ian | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% |
| 3 | LAUER Michael | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 47% | 32% |
| 5 | MBERIA Alexander | - | 3% | 25% | 54% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 6 | MACNEIL Matthew | 7% | 38% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 7 | REED Dusty (Allen) | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% |
| 8 | BRENNEMAN Adam | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 32% | 7% |
| 9 | STAUBITZ Marc | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 10 | KRAVITZ Sarah | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 11 | STOKELL Parker | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 12 | BRETHAUER Adah | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 13 | VAN DYK Mark | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 14 | FAENOVA Alexandra | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | REEN Stephen | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | SABOL Nathaniel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 17 | MACNEIL Sydney | 3% | 29% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | HENDERSON Emery | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 19 | HETRICK Owen | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | DUTTON Kimberly | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.