The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Premier Challenge ROC(D1A, DV2, VET), RJCC & PARA

Div II Men's Saber

Saturday, March 30, 2024 at 10:15 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHEXUAN yu - - 4% 15% 33% 35% 12%
2 HOPPA Luke H. - - 1% 9% 30% 42% 18%
3 ATWOOD Griffin - 1% 5% 20% 35% 30% 9%
3 POWER Alex - 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1%
5 VEDRE Neil 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 11% 2%
6 COOKSON Leonardo 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
7 PINTO Marcus - - 2% 11% 31% 40% 17%
8 WANG Jerry - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
9 CHOKSI Vihaan - - 3% 18% 39% 31% 8%
10 WITCZAK Mateus - - 5% 20% 37% 29% 8%
10 AO Christopher - 4% 17% 31% 30% 15% 3%
12 RYAN Kai - 1% 5% 20% 35% 30% 10%
13 BODKIN Jake M. - - 4% 21% 40% 29% 6%
14 WANG William M. - 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
15 ZHAO Lucas - - 2% 12% 30% 38% 18%
16 KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen 7% 26% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
17 WANG Max 1% 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1%
18 DESAUTELS Connor - 3% 14% 31% 32% 16% 3%
19 BHATIA Ekam - 1% 5% 17% 33% 32% 12%
20 SADHU Neiyam 1% 7% 24% 34% 25% 8% 1%
21 STAMIS Kyle - - 2% 10% 30% 41% 18%
22 KIM Theodore - 2% 13% 30% 34% 18% 3%
23 VLASENKO Bohdan - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
24 TEVEBAUGH Andrew - - 1% 8% 26% 40% 25%
25 SUBA Lucas - 2% 12% 28% 34% 19% 4%
26 CARR Dylan - - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
27 CHENG Brandon - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 4%
28 CUSUMANO Neal 1% 10% 28% 34% 20% 6% 1%
29 YUAN Kevin - - 1% 9% 30% 41% 19%
30 LUAN Mark 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 4% -
31 JONES Graham H. - - < 1% - 6% 30% 64%
32 WONG Max 4% 19% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
33 NGO Maximus - - 1% 5% 23% 44% 28%
34 TOZZI Massimo 1% 6% 21% 34% 28% 10% 1%
35 LEE Anderson - 2% 13% 36% 35% 13% 2%
36 SCHIMEL Luke 32% 41% 21% 5% 1% < 1% -
37 WANG Michael 1% 5% 18% 31% 29% 14% 3%
38 ZHOU Grant 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
39 SHAH Sajan - 1% 10% 29% 40% 20%
40 FREDRICK Jameer - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
41 DIMATTEO Michael - 2% 9% 24% 34% 24% 7%
42 HUANG Maxwell H. - 7% 29% 40% 20% 4% -
43 MARGULIS Jared - 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2%
44 WAXLER Aaron M. - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 22%
45 BERKOWITZ Gavin - 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 2%
46 CHAKRAVORTY Sohan 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
47 WAXLER Ryan - 5% 21% 37% 29% 8%
48 SUN Andrew 1% 8% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1%
49 SIMMONS John M. - 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
49 MANESCU Miron 1% 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
51 CHENG Hong - 2% 12% 30% 36% 17% 2%
52 GONG zihao - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
53 SHAH Sohan 2% 15% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
54 HE Bowen - 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 1%
55 SHELMIDINE Cole 8% 31% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
56 TERENTIEV Max - 1% 5% 18% 33% 31% 12%
57 BANSAL Krishiv 3% 15% 30% 30% 16% 4% -
58 BERGER Jacob 4% 21% 35% 27% 11% 2% -
59 RAMIREZ Nicholas 9% 27% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
60 UNG Kei 1% 7% 20% 32% 27% 12% 2%
61 PIENKOWSKI Jakub 15% 37% 32% 13% 3% - -
62 LIGH Checed 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
63 WEISS Toby 25% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
64 BARROWS Hunter 5% 27% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
65 SEN Christian 1% 7% 24% 36% 24% 7% 1%
66 MAMKIN Nathan 54% 36% 8% 1% - - -
67 WEN Edward - - 4% 16% 33% 34% 13%
68 WEI William 2% 27% 42% 23% 5% 1% -
69 FORD Tyler J. 1% 6% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
70 ONG Dylan 1% 19% 40% 30% 9% 1% -
71 GUEVARA Alexander 42% 41% 15% 2% - - -
72 JANUS Maksymilian 3% 24% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
73 VILEMAITIS Tadas 3% 15% 30% 30% 16% 4% -
74 WOLMART Zander 14% 40% 35% 9% 1% - -
75 ROSADO Sebastian 42% 40% 15% 3% - -
76 ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 5% -
77 BLACKBURN Henry 34% 45% 18% 3% - - -
78 AMES Kylan 6% 24% 37% 24% 8% 1% -
78 IVRON Yonatan 4% 18% 32% 29% 14% 3% -
80 CUNLIFFE Sebastian 45% 39% 13% 2% - - -
80 HAUSLER Jayden 25% 49% 22% 4% - - -
82 PINTO Augusto 16% 37% 32% 13% 3% - -
83 BADUSHOV Anton 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6% -
83 GAYEVSKY Maximilian 5% 21% 33% 26% 11% 2% -
85 LIEUWMA Nicolas 6% 28% 38% 22% 6% 1%
86 JACQUES Hugo 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
87 TABAK Eli 45% 44% 10% 1% - - -
88 MA ziteng 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
89 FLETCHER Logan 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
90 FENG Luke 82% 17% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.