University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TSE Aiden J | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
2 | HOLZ Lucas | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
3 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
3 | COBIAN Richard | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
5 | CHAN Henry | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
6 | CRICOL Damian | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
7 | LUC Linkin | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
8 | KANG Matthew | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
9 | WONG Lucas | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 11% | |
10 | WONG David | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
11 | VO Landon | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
12 | HO Anson | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
13 | MATHUR Ativ | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
14 | SU Kingston | 1% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
15 | TAN Ryan | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
16 | PROCOS Julian | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
17 | GRAEHL Ian | 4% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
18 | HENRY Ethan | 11% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
19 | ZHAO Aidan | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | |
20 | ANUMULA Aryan | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
21 | GONZALEZ Mark | 37% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
22 | VALERIE Erik | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
23 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
24 | IRVINE Patrick | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
25 | YUEN Caleb | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | BENTLEY TAMMERO Finley | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.