University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TSE Aiden J | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
2 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
3 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
3 | COBIAN Richard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
5 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
6 | CRICOL Damian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
7 | LUC Linkin | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
8 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
9 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% | |
10 | WONG David | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
11 | VO Landon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
12 | HO Anson | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | |
13 | MATHUR Ativ | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
14 | SU Kingston | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
15 | TAN Ryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
16 | PROCOS Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
17 | GRAEHL Ian | 100% | 96% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
18 | HENRY Ethan | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
19 | ZHAO Aidan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
20 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
21 | GONZALEZ Mark | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
22 | VALERIE Erik | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
23 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
24 | IRVINE Patrick | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
25 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | BENTLEY TAMMERO Finley | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.