Premier Challenge ROC(D1A, DV2, VET), RJCC & PARA

Div I-A Men's Saber

Sunday, March 31, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 WILSON Jude - - 3% 23% 61% 13%
2 MICLAUS Justin - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
3 TE VELDE Noah C. - - - - 4% 62% 34%
3 AYMAN Mostafa - - - - 8% 92%
5 OH Triton - - - 3% 15% 40% 43%
6 STAMIS Kyle - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
7 GONG Jerry 1% 12% 38% 35% 13% 2%
8 MICHELL Bailey - - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
9 BABAYEV Gabriel A. - - - 1% 7% 34% 59%
10 CHEONG Heonjun - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 25%
10 AL-NASSER Mahmoud - - - - 1% 37% 62%
12 BARNETT Adam - - - - 5% 30% 65%
13 FORMENTI Giulio - - 4% 18% 39% 33% 6%
14 TENG MATTHEW - 1% 7% 28% 43% 22%
15 GINSBERG Jordan - 7% 33% 48% 11% -
16 ZEWDA Kebron - 1% 9% 29% 40% 19% 2%
17 DEPEW Spencer - - 1% 10% 32% 42% 15%
18 ZHAO Lucas - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
19 CORTEZ Christopher - - 1% 11% 33% 40% 15%
20 KWALWASSER Eric - - - 4% 20% 44% 32%
21 FREDRICK Jameer 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
22 NG Jonathan - 6% 24% 38% 26% 6%
23 SUGIURA Samuel - 1% 7% 25% 40% 25% 4%
24 LAUB William - 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1%
25 WANG ANDREW CHANG - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 6%
26 PIWOWAR Alex - 1% 7% 23% 37% 27% 5%
27 LIN Steve - 2% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
28 VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
29 MATTOO Deven 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5%
30 TOZZI Massimo 1% 12% 32% 36% 16% 3% -
31 BYON Julian - 1% 7% 26% 41% 24%
32 TSAO Oliver 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
33 FIELDS Matthew S. - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
34 MATTOO Surya - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
35 HU Christopher - 1% 9% 38% 50% 3%
36 WANG Jerry 5% 24% 38% 26% 8% 1%
37 WANG Will - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 4%
38 JONES Graham H. - - 5% 24% 41% 25% 5%
39 DUMOULIN Gabriel 1% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6% 1%
40 CLARK Gabriel 7% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
41 CHAKRAVORTY Sohan 12% 35% 34% 15% 4% - -
42 LIU Kevin - 4% 21% 41% 28% 6%
43 GLOZMAN Justin - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15%
44 BROU Inkosi 1% 8% 28% 37% 22% 5%
45 DEANS Donovan - - - 1% 22% 77%
46 MCCARTHY Gabriel - 1% 7% 28% 43% 21%
47 KIM Theodore 1% 12% 37% 38% 12% - -
48 YUAN Kevin - 3% 16% 34% 31% 13% 2%
49 HUANG Alexander C. - 3% 17% 39% 31% 10% 1%
50 MCCARTHY Devan - 6% 29% 47% 17% -
51 DESAUTELS Connor 6% 34% 43% 16% 2% -
52 ZHOU Grant 4% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1% -
53 HO Jacob 1% 12% 34% 35% 15% 2% -
54 BRIDGEMAN Andrew T. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
55 COOKSON Leonardo - 5% 26% 44% 24% 1% -
56 MCDONALD Finn 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
57 BOULAIS Andrew D. 1% 10% 29% 34% 19% 5% 1%
58 WANG Max 4% 23% 37% 27% 8% 1%
59 LIU Jerry 8% 43% 38% 10% 1% -
60 WANG Daniel - 5% 21% 37% 29% 8%
61 BYON Adrian - < 1% 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
62 CHENG Hong 1% 16% 37% 31% 12% 2% -
63 SUBA Lucas 4% 25% 42% 23% 5% - -
64 BODKIN Jake M. 3% 15% 31% 31% 16% 4% -
65 CLARK Aram 3% 25% 39% 25% 7% 1%
66 RYAN Kai - 7% 29% 43% 21% 1% -
67 BADUSHOV Anton 3% 18% 35% 31% 11% 2% -
68 MANESCU Miron 4% 28% 39% 22% 5% 1% -
69 GONG zihao 4% 30% 46% 18% 1% -
70 VEDRE Neil 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
71 WANG Michael 7% 30% 38% 20% 4% - -
72 CHENG Brandon 4% 27% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
73 CUSUMANO Neal 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 2% -
74 VILEMAITIS Tadas 17% 48% 29% 6% - - -
75 BLACKBURN Henry 54% 38% 8% 1% - - -
76 SUN Andrew 14% 33% 33% 16% 4% - -
77 HUANG Maxwell H. 9% 38% 40% 12% 1% -
78 SCHIMEL Luke 66% 29% 5% - - -
79 MARGULIS Jared 20% 48% 26% 5% - -
80 BARROWS Hunter 53% 38% 8% 1% - -
81 SHELMIDINE Cole 63% 32% 5% - - -
82 KO Zuriel 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
83 AO Christopher 16% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
84 O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan 10% 41% 36% 11% 1% - -
85 RINDISBACHER Peter 63% 31% 6% - - - -
85 TEVEBAUGH Andrew 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 8% 1%
87 GUEVARA Alexander 61% 32% 6% 1% - - -
88 TSAO Alister 47% 42% 10% 1% - -
89 IVRON Yonatan 38% 42% 17% 3% - -
90 KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
91 AMES Kylan 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
91 BANSAL Krishiv 34% 43% 19% 4% - - -
93 GAYEVSKY Maximilian 46% 41% 12% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.