Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PRESANTH Nandana | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
2 | MACKAY Katherine | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
3 | JOHNSTON Lily | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
3 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
5 | BUSH Bethany | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
6 | BAINS Nandini | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
7 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% |
8 | GENTILE Vittoria | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
9 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
10 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
11 | TENG EMMA | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
12 | BROWN Aria | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
13 | CHI Claire | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
14 | STADNIK Emilia | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
15 | LIU Kelly | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
15 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
17 | DENNER Jasmina | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% |
18 | SPEARS Mya B | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
19 | NAYAK Esha | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
20 | CROOKS Riley | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
20 | VINOKUR Anita | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
22 | KIM Audrey | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
23 | SHMULER Fiona | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
24 | MYAT Chloe | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
25 | BIRNSTILL Reese | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
26 | ALAMI Amira | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
27 | BAIREDDY Maya | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | MONTORIO Lily M. | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
29 | BARROSO Isabela | 1% | 6% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
30 | MCGRAW Sadie | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
31 | STEYER Meredith J. | - | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
32 | NAYAK Antara | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | GETZONI Mary | 65% | 29% | 5% | < 1% | - | - | - |
34 | DEHON Inès | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
35 | NEUMAN Ella | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
36 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
37 | NAYAK Anika | - | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
38 | CHEN Jia | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
39 | MANSPERGER Gia | 14% | 34% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
40 | SCHLIENGER Katia | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
40 | ERBSEN Sarah | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
42 | BRUNGARDT Gabriela | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.