Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG ANDREW CHANG | - | - | - | - | 3% | 30% | 67% |
| 2 | ZHAO Lucas | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 3 | PRIEUR Christian F. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | CLARK Gabriel | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 5 | GONG zihao | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 6 | HENDERSON Lucas | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 7 | SUBA Lucas | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | |
| 8 | WAXLER Ryan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
| 9 | BRANDT Jaden | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 10 | TSAO Oliver | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | |
| 11 | SASSI Ilyas | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% |
| 12 | ATWOOD Griffin | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 13 | NGO Maximus | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 14 | WANG Michael | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 15 | ZHAO Royce | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | LAZARTE Gabriel | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 17 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 18 | LIM Brandon | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 55% | 15% |
| 19 | WONG Max | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | LI Maxwell | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | |
| 21 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | JIANG Terence | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SUN Andrew | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | SCHIMEL Luke | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 25 | VEDRE Neil | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | AO Christopher | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 27 | LOO Jason | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 27 | EYBELMAN Ariel | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 29 | CHEN Ryan | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | BALE ATMAN | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 31 | LUAN Mark | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 32 | WANG Jerry | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 33 | KENNEDY Tomás | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 34 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | SADHU Neiyam | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | PORTER Dupree | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | ZHANG Ray | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 38 | OREN Daniel | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 39 | TSAO Alister | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 40 | CHENG Sawyer | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 41 | LAUB William | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 42 | ONG Dylan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 43 | SWIFT Owen | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 44 | BARENBOYM Michael | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHIEN Nolan | 7% | 40% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | HELD Lev | 2% | 20% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WEISS Toby | 7% | 41% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 49 | FIROOZI Sam | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | ZWAKA Jonas | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | GINGERY Julian | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 53 | JAIN Karan | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | RANJAN Shaurya | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | ROSADO Sebastian | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | KUO Alden S. | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GAO Kai | 7% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | YANG Byron | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | LI Aidan | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.