Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG ANDREW CHANG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% |
| 2 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% |
| 3 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 3 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 5 | GONG zihao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 6 | HENDERSON Lucas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 7 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | |
| 8 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 9 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 10 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | |
| 11 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 12 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 13 | NGO Maximus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 32% |
| 14 | WANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 15 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | LAZARTE Gabriel | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 17 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 18 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 15% |
| 19 | WONG Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | LI Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 21 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | VEDRE Neil | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | AO Christopher | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 27 | LOO Jason | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 27 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 29 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 31 | LUAN Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 32 | WANG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 33 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 34 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | OREN Daniel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 39 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | CHENG Sawyer | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 41 | LAUB William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 42 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 43 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 44 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHIEN Nolan | 100% | 93% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | HELD Lev | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 93% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 49 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | GINGERY Julian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 53 | JAIN Karan | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | RANJAN Shaurya | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | ROSADO Sebastian | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | KUO Alden S. | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | GAO Kai | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | YANG Byron | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | LI Aidan | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.