University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | - | - | - | 4% | 96% |
| 2 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 3 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 3 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 5 | GORDON William L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
| 6 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 7 | PARK Andrew | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 8 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 9 | FUKUDA Brando | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% | |
| 10 | UPENDER West | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 11 | LEHTINEN Axel | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 12 | AGARWAL Savya | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 13 | CHAN Joseph | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 14 | ZHANG Jason | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 15 | WEI Winston | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 6% | |
| 16 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 17 | HE Ian | - | 5% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 2% | |
| 18 | YANG Tate | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 19 | ANDRADE Cedric | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | HE Bourne | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | SONG Peipei Yiheng | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | LIANG Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 1% |
| 23 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | HUANG Nathan | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 25 | LUK Trusten | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | LEE Christopher | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 27 | YEE Colin | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | GUO Joey | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 29 | DULAI Agam | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 31 | WILLIAMS Matthew | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | CHETWANI naman | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | CHEN Owen | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | - |
| 34 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 35 | SAFTA Aidan | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 1% |
| 36 | MARTIN Lucas | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | - |
| 37 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 38 | KIM Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | - |
| 39 | FEDOR Lucian | 18% | 47% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | HE Gary | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | BANUELOS Dario | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | DULAI Angad | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 43 | LI Austin | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | DOUGLASS Liam | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | AHN Theodore | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | CHEUNG Henry | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | LO Ernest | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | CRIDLAND Trent | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | CHENG Maxwell | 1% | 9% | 33% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 51 | ARCARA Evan | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | KO Ian | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | KONG Enoch | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | KO Cameron | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.