University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% |
| 2 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 3 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 3 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 5 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
| 6 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 7 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 8 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 9 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 10 | UPENDER West | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 11 | LEHTINEN Axel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 12 | AGARWAL Savya | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 13 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 14 | ZHANG Jason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 15 | WEI Winston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
| 16 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 17 | HE Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 22% | 2% | |
| 18 | YANG Tate | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | ANDRADE Cedric | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | HE Bourne | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | SONG Peipei Yiheng | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 1% |
| 23 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 25 | LUK Trusten | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 26 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | YEE Colin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | GUO Joey | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 29 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 32 | CHETWANI naman | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | - |
| 34 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | - |
| 35 | SAFTA Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 36 | MARTIN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | - |
| 37 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 38 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | - |
| 39 | FEDOR Lucian | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | HE Gary | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | BANUELOS Dario | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | DULAI Angad | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 43 | LI Austin | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | DOUGLASS Liam | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | AHN Theodore | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | LO Ernest | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | CRIDLAND Trent | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | CHENG Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 12% | 1% | |
| 51 | ARCARA Evan | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | KO Ian | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | KONG Enoch | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | KO Cameron | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.