University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 2 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 3 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 3 | FU Shannon | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 5 | DYMAR Anna | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 6 | CHI Zoe | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 7 | LI Anna | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 8 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 9 | ZHAO Emma | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 10 | BUDMAN Ava | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 11 | SUNG Audrey | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Julia Z. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 13 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 14 | PACHECO Carys | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | SINGLETARY Iona | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | ZHAO Ellie | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHANG Allison | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | ZU Jacqueline | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | YANG Emma | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | LI Allison | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
| 21 | KIM Vivian | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 22 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 23 | YU Jiaming | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | RASHID Summer | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | ERISMAN Gabriella | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.