University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEE Colin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 2 | YANG Tate | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 3 | KIM Andrew | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 3 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 5 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 6 | ZHANG Jason | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 7 | CHEN Owen | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 8 | EVANS Desmond | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 9 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% |
| 10 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 11 | HE Ian | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 26% |
| 12 | YU Jinyuan | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 13 | HE Gary | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | CHEUNG Henry | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 15 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 16 | HUANG Nathan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 17 | DING Sam | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | SAFTA Aidan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 19 | XU Ethan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 20 | DULAI Agam | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
| 21 | CHEN Ryker | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 22 | ALCAZAREN Cian | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LI Jake | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | KWONG Colin | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LIN Dylan | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 26 | CREMEL Remi | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 26 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | LIN Sampson | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | NGUYEN Nolan | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 30 | KO Ian | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHETWANI naman | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | LIN Stewart | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | KAJITA Grayson | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SHA Laien | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | KO Cameron | 9% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | CANTU Gabriel | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | BACH-Y-RITA MC | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SUTTON Alexander (AJ) | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HSU Liam | 45% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | BHANGOO Arman | 2% | 17% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | GU Evan | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | LE Oliver | 59% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.