University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 2 | YANG Tate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
| 3 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% |
| 3 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 5 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 6 | ZHANG Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 7 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 8 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 9 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
| 10 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 11 | HE Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 26% |
| 12 | YU Jinyuan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 13 | HE Gary | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 15 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 17 | DING Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | SAFTA Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
| 19 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 20 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 21 | CHEN Ryker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 22 | ALCAZAREN Cian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LI Jake | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | KWONG Colin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LIN Dylan | 100% | 78% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 26 | CREMEL Remi | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 26 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | LIN Sampson | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | NGUYEN Nolan | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 30 | KO Ian | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHETWANI naman | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | LIN Stewart | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SHA Laien | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | KO Cameron | 100% | 91% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | CANTU Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | BACH-Y-RITA MC | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SUTTON Alexander (AJ) | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HSU Liam | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | BHANGOO Arman | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | GU Evan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | LE Oliver | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.