University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Gwenyth | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | HOM Avery | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | HSIAO Ariya | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | MA Isabelle | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | NEUMANN Erika | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | HSU Emily | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 8 | HSU Rachel | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 9 | ZHOU Joi | V V D V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 10 | ARYA Leela | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | CHO Karis | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | THOTA Akira | D V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | PAN Samantha | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | JENA Aanvi | D V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 15 | ZHANG Queeny | V V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 16 | CHENG Audrey | V V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 17 | WANG Ellen | V V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 18 | LIN Avery | D V V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 19 | CHU Lauren | D D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | IRELAND Moira | V D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | KO Adeline | V D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 22 | STERNAD Pia | V D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 23 | KIM Audrey | V D D D V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 24 | YU Xintong | V D V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 25 | YANG Byanca | V D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 26 | TANG Amelia | D D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 27 | HO Chloe | D D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | YU-TAN Claire | D D D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | HOM Emma | D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 30 | PAWAR Sanvi | D D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 31 | THERIOT Reagan | D V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | VALOUEVA Katerina | D D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | HOFFMAN Isabelle | V D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | BHANGOO Paloma | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 35 | DONG Nancy | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 36 | WARBURTON Eleanor | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | BASTUNAS Marissa | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | PRAKASH Rhea | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 39 | LIU Madeleine | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 40 | SCHUETZENMEISTER Elena | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 41 | PARK Gian | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.