University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 2 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | HOM Avery | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 28% |
| 3 | HSIAO Ariya | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 5 | MA Isabelle | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 54% | 28% |
| 6 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 7 | HSU Emily | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 42% | 50% |
| 8 | HSU Rachel | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
| 9 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 10 | ARYA Leela | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 11 | CHO Karis | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
| 12 | THOTA Akira | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | PAN Samantha | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 34% | 7% |
| 14 | JENA Aanvi | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | ZHANG Queeny | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 16 | CHENG Audrey | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 17 | WANG Ellen | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LIN Avery | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 19 | CHU Lauren | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | IRELAND Moira | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | KO Adeline | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | STERNAD Pia | 2% | 20% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | KIM Audrey | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 24 | YU Xintong | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | YANG Byanca | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | TANG Amelia | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | HO Chloe | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | YU-TAN Claire | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HOM Emma | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | PAWAR Sanvi | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | THERIOT Reagan | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HOFFMAN Isabelle | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BHANGOO Paloma | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | DONG Nancy | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 11% | 42% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | PRAKASH Rhea | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | LIU Madeleine | 56% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SCHUETZENMEISTER Elena | < 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 41 | PARK Gian | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.