Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ABRAMKIN Tim | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | < 1% |
| 2 | ZENG Rick | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 51% | 14% |
| 3 | DONG Richard | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 3 | SHANNON Jack | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
| 5 | BELCHAMBER Mason | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | < 1% |
| 6 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 34% | 60% |
| 7 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 8% |
| 8 | ONIK Ari N. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 7% |
| 9 | BAKSHI Aman | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 10 | LI Allen | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 54% |
| 11 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 12 | LEE Charles T | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 13 | ZHANG Hanru | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
| 14 | HOU Gaven | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
| 15 | XU Nathan | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | CHA James | 7% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | JIN Andy | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 15% | |
| 18 | OH Joshua | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | XIE Jicheng | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
| 20 | LEE Thomas | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 21 | HART-SYED declan | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 22 | NABASSOUA Djibril | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 23 | NOVIKOV Yann | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | HOLMES Alexiy | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 24 | REN Ryan | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 26 | O'LEARY Colin | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 3% |
| 27 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | KIM Daniel | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | DIAZ Gabriel | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | GAO Andrew | 2% | 13% | 27% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | BAI Austin | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
| 32 | CHEN kenneth | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | ROSU Adrian | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 34 | MA Matthew | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 35 | TANG Royce | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 8% |
| 36 | SICAT Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
| 37 | KRZYWON Dylan | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 38 | CHOI Hunter | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | BEYDOUN Sam | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 40 | WEISS Jonah | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 42 | WANG Ancen | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 6% |
| 44 | LY Samuel | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 45 | KOVACS Harrison | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 46 | HUANG Jinyao | 4% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 47 | SHAW eric | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | YANG David H. | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | CHUN Zachary | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ZHENG Christopher | 2% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 51 | ULYSSE Jacob | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 52 | REYES Yannik | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | BLACK Henry | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | FROST Chayse | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 55 | JIANG Bohan | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 56 | WANG Luke | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 56 | JABLOKOV Roman | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | COSSROW Alex | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 59 | LIANG Haojia | 7% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | ZHENG Austin | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | KIM Aiden | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 62 | LIN Qianzhong | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | KAYE Ben | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 64 | WALDROOP Cuin | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 65 | HERBST Ari | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | ZHANG Ethan | 9% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | YOUM Tyson | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 68 | HU Daniel | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | CORDISCO Rocco | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 70 | CHUN Alexander | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | LIU Ryan | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | MARTIN Ahmir | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | SCHWERDT Jameson | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 74 | LEE Aeden | 19% | 44% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | HWANG Jacob | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | SINCAVAGE Louis | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.