Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
2 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
3 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | - | - | 8% | 39% | 53% |
3 | FIELD Julianna | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 28% |
5 | YANG Emma | - | - | - | 6% | 39% | 55% | |
6 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% | |
7 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
8 | HARRIS Julia | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
9 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
10 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
11 | WANG Amabel | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
12 | HAO Danica | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
13 | REN Kayley | - | - | 2% | 24% | 53% | 21% | |
14 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
15 | JOO Natalie | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% |
16 | FENG Audrey | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
17 | WONG Angellena | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 44% | 13% |
18 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
19 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
20 | KIM Claire | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
21 | XIA Mary-Jane | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
22 | BERGEL Daphne | - | 1% | 14% | 53% | 28% | 4% | |
23 | ZHANG Selena | - | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 16% | |
24 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 42% | 16% | |
25 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 1% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | SONG Jenna | 1% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
28 | HUANG Sophie | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
29 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
30 | WAN Celine | 12% | 42% | 38% | 7% | - | - | |
31 | EYER Brooke | 11% | 42% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
32 | SHENG Katherine | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
33 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
34 | BADLANI Diya | 1% | 12% | 43% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
35 | LEE Allison | 68% | 28% | 4% | < 1% | - | - | |
36 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 34% | 6% |
37 | LAZAR Carolina | 1% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 1% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
39 | YU Jane | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
40 | BERTOLINI Mia | 34% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | BAULIN Zoya | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
42 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
43 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | 3% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
44 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 7% | 46% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
45 | LIU Yinuo | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
46 | PELLE Lia | 19% | 47% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
47 | MANGLANI Maya | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
48 | SONG Erin | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | MULLER Amara | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
50 | SHANG Arianna | 15% | 47% | 31% | 7% | - | - | - |
51 | CHUNG Chloe | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
52 | BRODY Coco | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
52 | KO Darby | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
54 | CHOI Cara | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
55 | PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda | 37% | 46% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | MUNOZ Isabella | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | PARR Rory | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.